Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Murphy Cassone vs Nathan Ponwith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cassone vs Ponwith analysis and find out who is favored!
Murphy Cassone vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Ponwith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cassone has won 40.85% of points on his second serve, while Ponwith has won 52.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cassone, in recent form, has won 44.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 47.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.6% and 32.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cassone has saved 60.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 58.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cassone has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Ponwith winning 28.85% (W/L 15/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cassone winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cassone winning 2 and Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Cassone and Ponwith was at the Champaign Challenger, 12-11-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with Murphy Cassone getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cassone and Ponwith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cassone winning 0 times and Ponwith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cassone winning 0, and Ponwith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cassone has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.73 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 194.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cassone has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cassone has converted 28.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 40.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Ponwith
867
Rank
509
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
745
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
58% (38-27)
Career Total W/L
55% (168-135)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:38 | 1:23:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (45/65) | 63% (37/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (34/45) | 70% (26/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (26/59) | 29% (19/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Murphy Cassone
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 41% (20/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (55/57) | 47% (218/245) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 52 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:19 | 1:49:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331.8 | 223.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (237/379) | 57% (866/1512) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (174/237) | 65% (560/866) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (58/142) | 51% (332/646) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (11/39) | 42% (54/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (141/376) | 39% (568/1465) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 47% (7/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Murphy Cassone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Murphy Cassone
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Saahith Jayaraman
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Murphy Cassone
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Murphy Cassone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Murphy Cassone
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Christian Harrison
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Aidan Mchugh
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Maxwell Benson
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudy Quan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Cassone Vs Ponwith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
